With cordite in the air, splintered steel, shell casings and powder burns, there’s only one explanation...
Old WQ3 forum - archived. Links may not work.

How hard it would be to implement something like...

Postby dolny » Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:15 pm

...something similar to CTF. Two teams trying to get as much gold from the second team as possible, while preventing the second team from doing the same ;) It would be most exciting on a modified train map. There is a limit of money or time.

How hard would it be to code it?
Proud member of the HorseLovers clan.

Red Neckerson wrote:Oh and don't let dolny annoy you...he's a fanatic!
dolny
Gunslinger
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:11 am
Location: Poland



Postby dolny » Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:57 pm

Um, can anybody reply?
Proud member of the HorseLovers clan.

Red Neckerson wrote:Oh and don't let dolny annoy you...he's a fanatic!
dolny
Gunslinger
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:11 am
Location: Poland



Postby Gentleman » Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:07 pm

yes, that would be great, having ctf in wq3!
Roger me!
Gentleman
Drifter
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:05 pm



Postby torhu » Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:50 pm

Could probably be done in a couple of days work, but it's not worth the effort for me personally. Not at the moment, anyway. I'm sorry, but I don't play wq3 to play team games, it's FFA all the way.

I don't mean to be negative, it's just the way it is. Someone else might want to do it, though. But any more coding work on my part would probably be to fix bugs, not add new stuff. Because for me, the game is almost perfect the way it is. ;)
In game: =SG=monSter
Monster Browser
User avatar
torhu
SG Team
 
Posts: 1113
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 8:12 pm
Location: Norway



Postby L3th4l » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:00 pm

Not to mention that the maps would have to be reworked to allow for that type of gameplay and we just don't have the time or man power for that..
User avatar
L3th4l
Smokin' Amigo!
 
Posts: 1948
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 8:06 am
Location: Binghamton, NY. USA



Postby ReD NeCKersoN » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:11 pm

By now it should be common knowledge that wq3 will be opensourced when we release the standalone version. Hopefully, more coders will come along in the future. :wink: It's easy to have a good idea but implementing it can sometimes be difficult or very time consuming. It can also introduce new bugs or even cause problems in areas that we can't foresee.
Image
User avatar
ReD NeCKersoN
SG Team
 
Posts: 3245
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 6:22 am
Location: VA, USA



Postby dolny » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:58 pm

Thanks for the replies.

Personally, I only play WQ3 for teamgames, especially BR ;)
DM is boring for me.
Proud member of the HorseLovers clan.

Red Neckerson wrote:Oh and don't let dolny annoy you...he's a fanatic!
dolny
Gunslinger
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:11 am
Location: Poland



Postby sig11 » Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:26 pm

A variations could probably be implemented rather easily: When you die in BR, you don't spectate but respawn. That way, you _have_ to rob the bank to win - or defend it until time is over. Just an idea.
In-game name: =SG= Django (yes, it's cliché :-) )
User avatar
sig11
SG Team
 
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Germany



Postby dolny » Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:47 pm

A penalty of waiting at least 10 seconds (or wait for a team respawn every 30 seconds) would be good after death if it's not hard to code (just hypothetically).
Proud member of the HorseLovers clan.

Red Neckerson wrote:Oh and don't let dolny annoy you...he's a fanatic!
dolny
Gunslinger
 
Posts: 205
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:11 am
Location: Poland




Return to Feedback Forum

Show Sidebar
Show Sidebar

User Control Panel